The lead I chose for this blog is from a KSL article
regarding the shooting that occurred on the University of Utah campus on Oct.
30.
“SALT LAKE CITY – One person was shot dead in an attempted
carjacking in the foothills bordering the University of Utah campus Monday
evening, police said, forcing a lockdown at the university as police combed Red
Butte Canyon for a suspect late into the night.”
The reading this week described a summary lead as a lead
that should answer most of the who, what, when, where, why and how of the
story. It should give a broad overview of what will be explained in more detail
later in the article. A summary lead should also contain the most important factors,
so the reader can understand the story just by reading the first one or two
sentences.
I think this lead does a great job at introducing and
summarizing what happened in Salt Lake City that night. It doesn’t give away
too much information, but by reading it, you are able to get a good idea as to
what occurred. It contains enough information that the reader can get an
introduction to the story and can then dive deeper into the story for more
details.
The editing mistake I found this week was from an email I
received from a coworker. Part of her email said, “I tink there is something
else going on here.” This is an obvious mistake. The word “tink” should
actually be “think.” It’s interesting how we sometimes make mistakes on simple
words.
That lead definitely makes me want to keep reading. It gives all the pertinent details. As for the editing mistake, I am amazed that our brains will correct words even when they are wrong.
ReplyDelete